Legal Opinion
Doe v. Cutter Biological, a Division of Miles, Inc.
District Court, D. Idaho
Decided May 12, 1994No. Civ. 92-0434-S-HLRPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RYAN, Senior District Judge.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURE
Plaintiff John Doe is a hemophiliac. Because of his condition, John Doe received a clotting agent known as Factor VIII which facilitates the dotting of blood in hemophiliacs. In December of 1991, John Doe tested positive for the HIV virus.
On October 30, 1992, John Doe 1 commenced this federal action naming those providers of Factor VIII products which were administered to him by the Pocatello Regional Medical Center between 1979 and 1985. At this juncture, the named defendants include: Miles Inc. (Miles), and Armour…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Summers v. TiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Sindell v. Abbott LaboratoriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hamilton v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2001
- Kessel v. LeavittWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
- Spencer v. Baxter International, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
- Napier v. Osmose, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2005
- Aaron Coleman and Mendy Coleman, Husband and Wife v. Sig Sauer, Inc.; Palmetto State Armory, LLC; and Does I-X, unknown partiesDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2026
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.