Legal Opinion

American Mart Corp., Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc., Defendant-Appellee/cross-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 25, 1987No. 85-2849, 85-2910PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

American Mart Corp. (AMC) brought this action in district court alleging that Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc.’s (Seagram) termination of AMC’s liquor distribution franchises violated the Nevada Alcoholic Beverage Franchise Act (Franchise Act). Nev. Rev.Stat. §§ 598.290-598.350 (1985). The Franchise Act prohibits, inter alia, the termination of liquor distribution franchises without “good cause.” Id. § 598.330(2). But a franchisor is given a complete defense if it can prove that the termination was done “in good faith and for good cause.” Id. at § 598.350. The district court held that “good…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. American Mart Corp. v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 1985

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hartman v. DuffeyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
  2. Wright-Moore Corporation, Cross-Appellee v. Ricoh Corporation, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  3. Ziegler Co., Inc. v. RexnordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Central GMC, Inc. v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
  5. Freedman Truck Center, Inc. v. General Motors Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API