Legal Opinion

State v. Turel

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 12, 2002No. 0002-62248; A109741PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.

Appellant appeals a judgment adjudicating him to be a mentally ill person and committing him to the Mental Health Division. The trial court committed appellant because his mental disorder made him unable to provide for his basic personal needs, and he was not receiving the care necessary for his health or safety. ORS 426.005(1)(d)(B). 1 On de novo review, State v. O’Neill, 274 Or 59, 61, 545 P2d 97 (1976), we reverse.

At the time of hearing, appellant was 68 years old and had been a resident of the Gracelen Terrace Residential Care Center (the care center) for 13 years. Appellant suffers from…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. HitzOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. O'Neill v. O'NeillOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State v. BuntingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. State v. BrungardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  5. State v. AyalaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. B. B.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  2. State v. NorthCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  3. State v. PuhaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  4. State v. JuddCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  5. State v. B. C.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API