Legal Opinion
Rogers v. Frush
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided March 6, 1970No. [No. 234, September Term, 1969.]PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
In the unfortunate accident which gives rise to this litigation the boulevard rule was applied and we are not asked to interpret it.
Suit was brought in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County by Clarence Franklin Frush individually and as father and next friend of his son, Robert Randolph Frush, a minor, they being the appellees here. Defendants were Mary Fred Rogers and her husband, Winston Bratton Rogers, appellants. The matter was moved to Charles County for trial where a jury returned a verdict of $100,000.00 in favor of the infant plaintiff and $13,270.00 in favor of the father, the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Kennedy v. CrouchCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
- Potts v. Armour & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
- Gibson v. BEAVER AND SOUTHERN STATES HOWARD COUNTY PETROLEUM COOP., INC.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
- Lipscomb v. DiamianiSuperior Court of Delaware · 1967
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Mary Vizzini, Administratrix of the Estate of Salvatore Vizzini, Deceased v. Ford Motor Company C/o C. T. Corp. SystemCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Kealoha v. County of HawaiiHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
- Jones v. MalinowskiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. FlippoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Poole v. Coakley & Williams Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.