Legal Opinion
Tjeerdsma v. Global Steel Buildings, Inc.
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided February 27, 1991No. 17201PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Chief Justice.
Global Steel Buildings (Global) and Miracle Steel Corporation (Miracle Steel) appeal from an order denying arbitration. We affirm.
FACTS
Plaintiff Dale Tjeerdsma is a resident of, and farms near, Avon, South Dakota. Defendant Global is a North Dakota corporation with its principal place of business in Fargo. Defendant Miracle Steel is a South Dakota corporation with its principal place of business in Watertown.
Global sells steel buildings supplied to it by Miracle Steel. Generally, Global’s practice is to obtain sales leads and forward them to independent representatives.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- N&d Fashions, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation and Nelly Don, Inc., a Missouri Corporation v. Dhj Industries, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,231 William C. Fraser v. Merrill Lynch Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. Franklyn C. Shulman Allan G. KenzieCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
- Finkle and Ross v. AG Becker Paribas, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Weight Watchers of Quebec Ltd. v. Weight Watchers International, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1975
- Nesslage v. York Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Sopko v. C & R Transfer Co., Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Spenner v. CITY OF SIOUX FALLS, SOUTH DAKOTASouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Wesley Retirement Services, Inc. v. Hansen Lind Meyer, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1999
- Thunderstik Lodge, Inc. v. ReuerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Millard v. City of Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.