Legal Opinion

Bridgeport Hydraulic Co. v. Kraemer

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided December 10, 1953No. Civ. No. 3936PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HINCKS, Circuit Judge.

This is an action to recover excess profits taxes allegedly overpaid for the years 1941-1943 to the defendants who were successively Collectors of Internal Revenue. Most of the underlying facts were proved by a voluminous stipulation. The plaintiff’s brief contains a remarkably lucid summary of the operative facts which in large part I adopt as my

Finding of Facts.

1. Throughout the period here relevant the plaintiff, a Connecticut corporation, computed its excess profits credit on the average base-period earnings basis. Its first taxable year under the excess profits tax…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hartford & New-Haven Rail Road v. KennedySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1838
  2. Webb v. MoellerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
  3. Stamford Trust Co. v. Yale & Towne Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
  4. Smith v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1923
  5. Bigelow v. BicekAppellate Court of Illinois · 1938

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bridgeport Hydraulic Company v. Frank W. Kraemer and John J. Fitzpatrick, Collectors of Internal Revenue for the District of ConnecticutCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
  2. Bridgeport Hydraulic Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1954
  3. Bridgeport Hydraulic Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API