Slack v. Suddoth
Tennessee Supreme Court
FROM SHELBY. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Shelby County. Steeling Pieeson, Ch.
1Opinion of the CourtWilkes, J.
Drs. Slack and Suddoth were partners in the practice of dentistry in the city of Memphis for a number of years. They occupied two offices on the second floor of No. 243 Main Street, which they rented or leased year by year. They were equally interested in the business and property of the firm and the partnership was un limited as to duration. The subject of dissolution was discussed between them for several months, but no satisfactory conclusion was reached until, on April* 30, 1894, complainant notified defendant that the partnership was dissolved. Before doing so, however, or on the day…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Warfield v. BoothCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1870
- Hoyt v. HollySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1872
3Cited by18 opinions
- Nail v. NailTexas Supreme Court · 1972
- Agricultural Services Association, Incorporated v. Ferry-Morse Seed Company, Incorporated, and Waldo Rohnert Company, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Macfadden v. JenkinsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1918
- Bailly v. BettiNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Fine v. LawlessTennessee Supreme Court · 1917
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.