Legal Opinion

King v. City of Eastpointe

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 4, 2003No. 01-2303PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROGERS, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs, Charles Franklin King, Sr. (“King, Sr.”), Belinda King, Charles Franklin King, Jr. (“Charlie”), Davon Edward King (“Davon”), and Martez King (“Martez”), appeal from the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the City of Eastpointe and defendant police officers (the “City”) on their claims brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 and 1983. These claims arise out of four incidents of alleged police misconduct. The district court concluded that there was no evidence of racial discrimination or of a specific practice or policy targeting…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Donald Bennett v. City of EastpointeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  2. Carthan v. Snyder (In re Flint Water Cases)District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019
  3. Taylor v. City of FalmouthCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  4. Carmichael v. City of ClevelandDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2012
  5. Valdez v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2014

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API