Legal Opinion

De Bauche v. Knott

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1975No. 484PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

This is an appeal from an order overruling demurrers to the complaint by defendants-appellants Bruce Manser and his insurer, The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company (Ohio Casualty). The basis of the demurrers was that the complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against Bruce Manser or Ohio Casualty.

The material allegations of the complaint are as follows:

“That, on June 3, 1969, at approximately 7:30 p.m., the defendant Michael Knott, then 14 years of age, was the owner of a Crossman BB rifle.
“That, at said time, the plaintiff James L. De Bauche and a friend,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. A. E. Investment Corp. v. Link Builders, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Scheeler v. BahrWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Milwaukee County v. Schmidt, Garden & EriksonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Estate of MayerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Theune v. City of SheboyganWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Coffey v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Rockweit v. SenecalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. WilliquetteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Hoven v. KelbleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Hartridge v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1978

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API