Legal Opinion

Gregory Dickens v. Charles L. Ryan

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 3, 2012No. 08-99017PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge N.R. SMITH; Dissent by Judge REINHARDT.

OPINION

N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judge:

Gregory Scott Dickens, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition. Dickens was sentenced to death on each of two counts of felony murder for the 1991 killings of Bryan and Laura Bernstein. In this petition, Dickens challenges his capital sentences, arguing that (1) the Arizona Supreme Court’s application of Enmund v. Florida, 458 U.S. 782, 102 S.Ct. 3368, 73 L.Ed.2d 1140 (1982), and Tison v. Arizona, 481 U.S. 137, 107 S.Ct. 1676, 95…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Adbul-Mumit v. Alexandria Hyundai, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
  2. Jihad Adbul-Mumit v. Alexandria Hyundai, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
  3. Rienhardt v. ShinnDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021
  4. Schad v. RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  5. Schad v. RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API