Legal Opinion

State v. Hall

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 26, 1971No. 714SC237PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Judge.

The following instructions were included in the charge to the jury:

“. . . This is not a question of sympathy or prejudice. It is merely a question of facts and the only question you are to consider is: Was the defendant at the time and place in question under the influence of intoxicating beverages.” [Emphasis ours.]

Later in the charge the judge instructed the jury as follows:

“Now, Ladies and Gentlemen of the Jury, the Court instructs you that upon this evidence you may return a verdict of guilty or not guilty bearing in mind the only question that you are to consider and the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State v. CanipeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. State v. SimpsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. State v. McLambSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. State v. HairrSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  5. State v. . LoveSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. CastanedaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  2. State v. McLeanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API