Legal Opinion
State v. Hall
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided May 26, 1971No. 714SC237PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAUGHN, Judge.
The following instructions were included in the charge to the jury:
“. . . This is not a question of sympathy or prejudice. It is merely a question of facts and the only question you are to consider is: Was the defendant at the time and place in question under the influence of intoxicating beverages.” [Emphasis ours.]
Later in the charge the judge instructed the jury as follows:
“Now, Ladies and Gentlemen of the Jury, the Court instructs you that upon this evidence you may return a verdict of guilty or not guilty bearing in mind the only question that you are to consider and the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- State v. CanipeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- State v. SimpsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- State v. McLambSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- State v. HairrSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- State v. . LoveSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. CastanedaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- State v. McLeanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973