Lerman v. Tilo Roofing Co.

By this action of contract the plaintiffs seek to recover damages for the breach of a written agreement for roofing work done oh plaintiffs’ property.

*73The answer is a general denial and payment.

The trial judge made the following findings of facts:

“In this case, I viewed the premises and the subject matter in litigation twice; — once during the trial; and again, after the hearing, and after a severe rainstorm, on June 10, 1946, the parties requesting me to do so.

By request of counsel, the case was re-argued on July 19, 1946, at which time counsel asked that they be given leave to file briefs…