Legal Opinion
Crowninshield Shipbuilding Co. v. Jackman
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided May 22, 1933PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
The writ in this action of contract was dated on September 15, 1930. The declaration alleged that the defendant owed the plaintiff $300 for rent of a building according to the account annexed. .On May 26, 1932, the plaintiff filed a paper entitled “Demand to Admit *22Facts Under G. L. Ch. 231, Sec. 69.” The facts, the admission of which thus was demanded, were sixteen in number. Thereafter the defendant filed a paper, admitting some facts and denying' others, which was signed not by the defendant but by his attorneys. When the case came on tó be tried the presiding ]udgeTuled over the objection…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Nickerson v. GlinesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
- Davis v. Smith-Springfield Body Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
- Hall v. KotowskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
- Graustein v. WymanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
- Butter v. SovrenskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Povey v. Colonial Beacon Oil Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Cameron v. BuckleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Liggett Drug Co. v. License CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- First National Stores Inc. v. H. P. Welch Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Daniel v. JardinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.