Legal Opinion
Wickersham Banking Co. v. Nicholas
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 17, 1905No. Civ. No. 97PublishedCited by 6 opinions
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sonoma County, and from an order denying a new trial. A. G. Burnett, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
This is an action upon two certain written instruments, one for $150 and one for $125, and, except as to the amount and date of maturity, both were in the form following:
“$150.00.
Petaluma, June 20th, 1901.
“For value received, thirteen months after date I promise to pay to the order of P. H. Eigholz one hundred and fifty dollars in United States gold coin, with interest in like gold coin at the rate of 6 per cent per annum. The consideration of this and other notes is a Heine piano, No. 11,334, which I have received of -said P. H. Eigholz. Nevertheless, it is understood and agreed by and…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Meyer v. Glenmoor Homes, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1966
- Cargile v. Union State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Bourne v. RootCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- University Chevrolet Co. v. Bank of MoundvilleAlabama Court of Appeals · 1933
- Kannan v. Apple Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.