Legal Opinion

United States v. Thomas Raymond Ross

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 11, 2003No. 01-10277PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Per curiam

1. A federal jury convicted Thomas Raymond Ross of three drug crimes. Four months later, Ross learned that his lawyer, Malik Ali Muhammad, had been suspended from practice by the California state bar shortly before the start of Ross’s trial, 1 and had never been admitted to practice in the federal district court where Ross was convicted. Ross argues that his Sixth Amendment right to assistance of counsel includes the right to a lawyer who is an active member of the bar at the start of trial, and thus—no matter how well or poorly Muhammad actually performed— Ross’s rights were violated.

Although…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Mickens v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. VanderpoolNebraska Supreme Court · 2013
  2. United States v. GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. United States v. Escamilla-RojasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. Elfgeeh v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
  5. Osumi v. GiurbinoDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2006

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API