Legal Opinion
State v. Starcevich
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided December 16, 1983No. 2 CA-CR 3071PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BIRDSALL, Judge.
The principal question presented in this appeal is whether the trial court employed every feasible means to enable the appellant, who was removed from the courtroom at the beginning of the trial, to hear, observe or be informed of the further course of the trial and to consult with counsel in compliance with Rule 9.2(c) of the Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure, 17 A.R.S. We hold that the trial court did adequately protect the appellant’s rights in this regard.
The appellant was charged and ultimately convicted of kidnapping and three counts of sexual assault. Although…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Richard S. BerryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- State v. LandrumArizona Supreme Court · 1976
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. StarcevichCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983