Legal Opinion

State v. Landrum

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1976No. 3243PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GORDON, Justice.

Appellant, Gary Michael Landrum, was convicted by a jury of burglary, rape and armed robbery. He appeals from the judgment and sentence. We took jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 47(e)(5), Rules of the Supreme Court.

The three issues presented on appeal are whether the trial court erred in denying appellant’s motion to suppress his statement made at the time of arrest, whether appellant was denied a speedy trial pursuant to Rule 8.2(d), Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure and whether prosecutor’s mention of the word “alibi” in closing argument was so prejudicial as to deny…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. State v. GonzalesArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  5. State Ex Rel. Berger v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1974

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. State v. HardingArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. MinceyArizona Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State v. GretzlerArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. MorseArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. SullivanArizona Supreme Court · 1981

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API