Legal Opinion
Cole v. Rustgard
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 18, 1933No. 7155PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARRECHT, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal (erroneously termed writ of error, the writ of error having been abolished in 1928, 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 861a and 861b), from'am order of the District Court setting aside and quashing service of summons for the reason that the summons so served' was uncertified, certification being required by the laws of the Territory of Alaska. Section 878 of the Compiled Laws of Alaska reads as follows : “The summons shall be served by delivering a copy thereof, together with a copy of the complaint prepared and certified by the plaintiff, his agent, or attorney, or by…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Collins v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Arnold v. United States Ex Rel. W. B. Guimarin & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Henderson v. Richardson Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1928
- Collin County Nat. Bank of McKinney v. HughesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- Loflin v. AyresCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Glinski v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
- In re National Finance & Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
- In re MelekovCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- Arizona Barite Co. v. Western-Knapp Engineering Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
- Tee-Hit-Ton Tribe of Tlingit Indians ex. rel. U. S. v. OlsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.