Arnold v. United States Ex Rel. W. B. Guimarin & Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of Appeals which modified a judgment of the District Court in an action under the. Materialmen’s Act, and remanded the cause for further proceedings.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sanford
This action was brought by a subcontractor, in the name of the . United States, in a Federal District Court in South Carolina, under the 'Materialmen’s Act of August 13, 1894, c. 280, 28 Stat. 278, as amended by the Act of February 24, 1905, c. 778, 33 Stát. 811,. to recover on a contractor’s bond for the construction of a naval storehouse. Judgment was’ had against the contractor and his surety for the full penalty of. the bond. The Circuit Court of Appeals modified this judgment and remanded'the cause to the District Court' for. further proceedings. 280 Fed. 338.
The case has been brought…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Collins v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- La BourgogneSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- United States Ex Rel. Texas Portland Cement Co. v. McCordSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Illinois Surety Co. v. United States Ex Rel. PeelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Hohorst v. Hamburg-American Packet Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- In re Saco Local Development Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- Schoenamsgruber v. Hamburg American LineSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Republic of China v. American Express Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Jiffy Lubricator Co. v. Stewart-Warner CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
- Southland Industries, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.