Legal Opinion

Paulus v. Smith

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 25, 1966No. Gen. 50,008PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Murphy

The defendants, City of Chicago and its employees, appeal from a permanent injunction which restrains defendants from (1) revoking a sign permit issued to plaintiff, and (2) from interfering with or preventing plaintiff from proceeding with the completion of the sign erected under the permit. The trial court found the suit to be “an appropriate case for the application of the doctrine of equitable estoppel.”

The Municipal Ordinances of the City of Chicago involved in this appeal are section 86.1-15.1 of the Illuminated Signs and Signboards Ordinance and section 10.14 (4) of Chapter 194A of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Cities Service Oil Co. v. City of Des PlainesIllinois Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Anderson v. City of Park RidgeIllinois Supreme Court · 1947
  4. City of Chicago v. VokesIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Conlon-Moore Corp. v. CumminsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1960

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Corey Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Board of Zoning AdjustmentSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
  2. Merz v. VolberdingAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  3. Metromedia, Inc. v. City of Des PlainesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  4. People Ex Rel. American Nat. Bk. v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois · 1969
  5. Foster & Kleiser v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API