Legal Opinion

Foster & Kleiser v. City of Chicago

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 20, 1986No. 85-3612PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McNAMARA

Plaintiff, Foster & Kleiser, received permits from defendant, the city of Chicago, to erect two electric signs. After plaintiff had erected the signs, the city revoked the permits. Plaintiff filed an action for injunctive, declaratory and other relief, seeking to enjoin the city from revoking the permits. Following a trial without a jury, the trial court held that although the permits were valid, they were properly revoked because the sign structures were immediately adjacent to certain landmark buildings. The court also held, however, that the permits had ripened into property rights and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San DiegoSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Cities Service Oil Co. v. City of Des PlainesIllinois Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Northern Illinois Automobile Wreckers & Rebuilders Ass'n v. DixonIllinois Supreme Court · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Munizza v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  2. Monahan v. Village of HinsdaleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  3. Glenn v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  4. Leekha v. WentcherAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  5. Leekha v. WentcherAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API