Legal Opinion
Smith v. United States
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided November 23, 1951No. Civ. 3460PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KNOUS, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court upon the defendant’s motion to dismiss the amended complaint.
The plaintiff alleges that his cause of action arises under the Tort Claims Act, Title 28, U.S.C.A. § 1346. The amended complaint pleads that the plaintiff for many years has enjoyed grazing permits issued by the Secretary of Agriculture which allowed plaintiff to graze 1,100 head of sheep in Routt National Forest in Colorado. It is further recited that on or about January, 1950, the defendant made a wrongful and illegal finding to the effect that some of plaintiff’s sheep had…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Marshall v. CrottyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1950
- Osborne v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
- Oman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
- Palmer v. WalshDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1948
- McCarthy v. WattDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bernitsky v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Bernitsky v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Alfred Heber Powell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
- Leland Ray Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952