Legal Opinion

Williams v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)

Decided March 6, 2002No. 06-01-00053-CRPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CORNELIUS, Chief Justice.

Clayton Williams appeals from his conviction for criminal nonsupport. He was convicted on his plea of guilty, and the trial court assessed his punishment at two years’ confinement in a state jail facility. Williams contends in a single point of error that the statute under which he was convicted, Tex. Pen.Code Ann. § 25.05 (Vernon Supp.2002), is unconstitutional because it violates Article I, § 18 of the Texas Constitution. Tex. Const, art. I, § 18'. That section provides that, “No person shall ever be imprisoned for debt.”

This Court has previously addressed…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ex Parte HillCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
  2. Bason v. HughartTexas Supreme Court · 1847
  3. Ex Parte HallTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Dickens v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  5. Ex Parte McManusCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lancaster v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2010
  2. Brian Lancaster v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2010
  3. Brian Lancaster v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2010
  4. C.L. Carroll v. J.R. Sessions, Jr., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1992
  5. Ex Parte Thomas Franklin Shoe, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API