Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Hall

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1993No. D-1820PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HECHT, Justice.

An order to pay spousal and child support may be based upon a contractual obligation, but the order is enforceable by contempt only to the extent that the support awarded is also authorized by the Texas Family Code and Constitution. Relator in this original habeas corpus proceeding was held in contempt for failing to pay support ordered solely on the basis of a prenuptial agreement. The support order was not based upon statutory authority and thus was not enforceable by contempt. We therefore grant the writ and order relator discharged.

Nearly a year passed after Craig…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cunningham v. CunninghamTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Ex Parte GorenaTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Ex Parte DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Ex Parte Claude D. BirkheadTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Mobley v. MobleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Iliff v. IliffTexas Supreme Court · 2011
  2. In Re HenryTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Bruni v. BruniTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  4. In Re Houston, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002
  5. the Office of the Attorney General of Texas v. Richard Lynn ScholerTexas Supreme Court · 2013

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API