Legal Opinion

Ex Parte McManus

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 10, 1979No. 20198PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTSON, Justice.

Relator Jerry Joe McManus brings this original application for a writ of habeas corpus, contending that the contempt order subject to which he is confined, is void. This contention is based on the grounds that enforcement of the order amounts to imprisonment for debt, that he was not identified at trial as respondent’s former husband, that no showing was made that he had failed to make proper support payments, and that the divorce decree upon which the contempt order is based is ambiguous. We hold that the order is not void and therefore deny the application.

Relator and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Cooke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Blackmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Ex Parte SlavinTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Ex Parte HelmsTexas Supreme Court · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Konvalinka v. Chattanooga-Hamilton County Hospital AuthorityTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Ex Parte BlasingameTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Drew v. Unauthorized Practice of Law Committee, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998
  4. Ex Parte McNemeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  5. Ex Parte Jackman, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1983

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API