Legal Opinion

Gregor v. Szarmach

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 25, 1999No. 45A04-9805-CV-241PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DARDEN, Judge

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

James Gregor moved for summary judgment on William Szarmach’s claim against him, asserting the claim was barred because Szarmach had failed to file notice as required by the Indiana Tort Claims Act. He appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

ISSUES

1. Whether the trial court erroneously denied Gregor’s motion for summary judgment based upon Szarmach’s failure to file notice under the Act.

2. Whether the trial court erred in ordering Gregor “estopped from claiming immunity as a government employee under the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Mullin v. Municipal City of South BendIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Hinshaw v. Board of Com'rs of Jay CountyIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Delaware County v. PowellIndiana Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Lake County Juvenile Court v. SwansonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Bienz v. BloomIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Davidson v. PerronIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Fowler v. BrewerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Lyons v. Richmond Community School Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Mills v. Hausmann-McNallyDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2014
  5. Mills v. Hausmann-McNally, S.C.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2014

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API