State v. Herring, 06 Je 8 (6-21-2007)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant Nathan "Boo" Herring appeals from the Jefferson County Common Pleas Court's decision denying his petition for post conviction relief. The issue in this appeal is whether the trial court correctly determined that the petition for post-conviction relief was untimely and the provision in R.C. 2953.23(A)(1) and (2) were inapplicable. For the reasons expressed below, the judgment of the trial court is hereby affirmed.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
{¶ 2} In State v. Herring, 7th Dist No. 00JE37, 2002-Ohio-2786, this court set forth the fact of this case as follows:
{¶ 3} "In the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. LytleOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. ColeOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. YarbroughOhio Supreme Court · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. GabrielOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
- State v. Peterson, 08 Ma 102 (3-24-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. WoodOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- In re J.P.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. Thomas, 08-Je-1 (9-19-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008