Legal Opinion

LeFave v. Dimond

California Supreme Court

Decided August 10, 1956No. L. A. 24014Published

1Opinion of the Court

46 Cal.2d 868 (1956)

L. J. LeFAVE et al., Appellants,

v.

JAMES H. DIMOND et al., Respondents.

L. A. No. 24014.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

Aug. 10, 1956.

Buchalter, Nemer & Fields and Murray M. Fields for Appellants.

Gitelson, Ashton, Moore & Coyle, Alfred Gitelson and Leon M. Cooper for Respondents.

GIBSON, C.J.

In a prior action defendant Dimond sought to recover possession of personal property from plaintiffs, LeFave and others. Dimond invoked the provisional remedy of claim and delivery, filing an undertaking as required by statute. (See Code Civ. Proc., 509, 512. [fn. 1]) After the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Viner v. UntrechtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Lambert v. HaskellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Drinkhouse v. Van NessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Mitchell v. HawleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Curtiss v. BachmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API