LeFave v. Dimond
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
46 Cal.2d 868 (1956)
L. J. LeFAVE et al., Appellants,
v.
JAMES H. DIMOND et al., Respondents.
L. A. No. 24014.
Supreme Court of California. In Bank.
Aug. 10, 1956.
Buchalter, Nemer & Fields and Murray M. Fields for Appellants.
Gitelson, Ashton, Moore & Coyle, Alfred Gitelson and Leon M. Cooper for Respondents.
GIBSON, C.J.
In a prior action defendant Dimond sought to recover possession of personal property from plaintiffs, LeFave and others. Dimond invoked the provisional remedy of claim and delivery, filing an undertaking as required by statute. (See Code Civ. Proc., 509, 512. [fn. 1]) After the…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Viner v. UntrechtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Lambert v. HaskellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Drinkhouse v. Van NessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Mitchell v. HawleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Curtiss v. BachmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.