Legal Opinion

Dominguez-Roque v. Alsaffar

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided March 11, 2024No. 3:21-cv-00344Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION EDUARDO DOMINGUEZ-ROQUE, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. 3:21-CV-00344-MGG FAEZ ALSAFFAR, ET AL., Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER Pending and ripe before the Court is Defendants Faez Alsaffar and Classic Transportation Services, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Eduardo Dominguez-Roque’s case. Plaintiff, now proceeding pro se, is suing Defendants on an Indiana state law negligence diversity claim. [DE 1, 4]. This Order is entered based on the parties’ consent pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1). [DE 11]. For the subsequent…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mark A. Ball v. City of Chicago and Alfred S. Schultz, Individually and as Agent of the City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  2. William Hallam Webber v. The Eye CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  3. Kasalo v. Harris & Harris, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  4. John McMahan v. Deutsche Bank AGCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  5. Eddie Washington v. Daniel WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API