Legal Opinion

BAY CREEK LUMBER AND MFG. CO. v. Cesla

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1958PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.(1)

This is an appeal in an action for the conversion of certain rough lumber which the plaintiff respondent, Bay Creek Lumber and Mfg. Co., a corporation, delivered to the defendants appellant, Carl Cesla and Fred Grabrielson, co-partners, doing business as St. Johns Planing Mill, in Portland, Oregon. The deliveries made over a period of approximately six months in 1951 consisted of 199 truck loads and were received by the defendants for the purpose of planing and then returned to plaintiff on demand or sold for plaintiff’s use and benefit.

Acting pursuant to ORS 17.720, the parties…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bowser v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Ward v. TOWN TAVERNOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Anderson v. North Pacific Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Butts v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Crane v. School District No. 14.Oregon Supreme Court · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. PayneOregon Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Moore v. West Lawn Memorial Park, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
  3. State v. ShadleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  4. Arney v. CITY OF NORTH BEND GOHNOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Ostlund v. HendricksCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API