Legal Opinion
Kalafrana Shipping Ltd. v. Sea Gull Shipping Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 4, 2008No. 08 Civ. 5299(SAS)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.
1. INTRODUCTION
On July 10, 2008, this Court entered an ex parte order on behalf of Kalafrana Shipping Ltd. directing attachment and garnishment of up to $639,635.38 of the assets of Sea Gull Shipping Co. Sea Gull Shipping now moves to vacate and reduce that attachment on two separate grounds. First, it asserts that this Court does not have jurisdiction to issue an attachment for claims based on a vessel sale contract. 1 Second, Sea Gull asserts that the attachment was either wrongful or an abuse of process. 2 For the reasons stated below, the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Kossick v. United Fruit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. James N. Kirby, Pty Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
- North Pacific Steamship Co. v. Hall Bros. Marine Railway & Shipbuilding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Min Jin v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Exxon Corp. v. Central Gulf Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Federal Insurance Co. v. Speedboat Racing Ltd.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2016
- Polestar Maritime Ltd. v. Nanjing Ocean Shipping Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Icon Amazing, LLC v. Amazing Shipping, Ltd.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2013
- Aggelikos Prostatis Corp. v. Shun Da Shipping Group Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Optimum Shipping & Trading, S.A. v. Prestige Marine Services Pte. Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.