Icon Amazing, LLC v. Amazing Shipping, Ltd.
District Court, S.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DAVID HITTNER, District Judge.
On June 11, 2013, the Court entered an Order (Document No. 36) granting Defendants’ Opposed Motion to Vacate Attachment and Dismiss Complaint (Document No. 22). The Court’s ruling was based on the motion, submissions, applicable law, and oral arguments presented to the Court on Monday, June 10, 2013, at a hearing in open court. The Court’s determination was grounded on the finding that the Court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction. This memorandum opinion sets forth the Court’s factual findings and legal conclusions .supporting that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kossick v. United Fruit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. James N. Kirby, Pty Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
- North Pacific Steamship Co. v. Hall Bros. Marine Railway & Shipbuilding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Exxon Corp. v. Central Gulf Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Shipping Corp. of India Ltd. v. Jaldhi Overseas PTE Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lightering LLC v. Teichman Grp., LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2018
- E.N. Bisso & Son, Inc. v. Bouchard Transportation Co., Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2019
- ECLIPSE LIQUIDITY, INC. v. GEDEN HOLDINGS LTD.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- Harbor Pilots of NY NJ, LLC v. Bouchard Transportation Co., Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2020
- Nassau Maritime Holdings Designated Activity Company v. Riverside Navigation, Ltd.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.