Legal Opinion

Frazier v. Glasgow

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 19, 1975No. 7419SC893PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

Plaintiff contends the trial court erred in “refusing to charge the jury in regard to punitive damages.” The record reveals that the plaintiff formulated and tendered to the trial judge the three issues which were submitted to the jury.: The third issue clearly refers solely to actual damages. After the judge had completed his instructions to the jury, plaintiff’s counsel requested the court to charge the jury “on the element of punitive damages in considering the Third Issue.” [Emphasis-ours.]

■The plaintiff never asked the trial court, either orally or-ín writing, to submit…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hinson v. DawsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. Lewis v. . FountainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  3. Cottle v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  4. Shute v. FisherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. Baker v. MALAN CONSTRUCTION CORPORATIONSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lail Ex Rel. Lail v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Shugar v. GuillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Nash v. MayfieldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Shugar v. GuillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  5. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API