Legal Opinion

Kleiman v. Orion Knitting Mills

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 5, 1921PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the Baltimore City Court (Dawkths, J.). Action by the Orion Knitting Milla, a body corporate, against Joseph Kleiman and Louis Gr. Pollikoff, co-partners trading as the Baltimore Jobbing and Specialty Company, for the purchase price of goods sold. E'rom a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtOffutt, J.

The appellants, who are engaged in the City of Baltimore in the purchase and sale of cotton and woolen goods as “jobbers,” on January 15th, 1920, ordered from the appellee, a. manufacturer of such merchandise located at Kinston, Worth Carolina, sixty dozen pairs of stockings at six dollars per dozen. The contract of sale provided that the articles purchased were to be shipped to the appellants at Baltimore in March, but it also contained this, provision:

“This order is not subject to cancellation except by agreement. Seller shall not be held liable for late or non-delivery caused by strikes,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Barabasz v. KabatCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1900
  2. United Railways & Electric Co. v. State Ex Rel. DeaneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1901
  3. Bagby v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1893
  4. W. B. Saunders Co. v. DuckerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1911
  5. New York, Philadelphia & Norfolk Railroad v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1901

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mahan v. State Ex Rel. CarrCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
  2. Carozza v. Peacock Land Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
  3. Lambdin v. DantzebeckerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1935
  4. Cavacos v. SarwarCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  5. Catalano v. BopstCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API