Legal Opinion

Hobbs v. Small

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 31, 1908No. 1139PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action for damages, from city court of Fitzgerald — Judge Jay. April 1, 1908.

1Opinion of the CourtPowell, J.

This case comes to us upon the sustaining of a general demurrer; and the .allegations of the petition are therefore to be taken as the truth of the case. The defendant, who was the owner and operator of a plant in which lumber, sashes, doors, blinds, etc., were manufactured, directed the plaintiff, a boy, sixteen years of age, who had been previously engaged at the mill in piling and hauling lumber, to assist another employee in edging boards at a jointer, which is a machine containing a set of rapidly-revolving gang-saws, a work in which the plaintiff was wholly inexperienced. In response to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Moore v. Dublin Cotton MillsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  2. Southern Cotton-Oil Co. v. GladmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  3. Bush v. West Yellow Pine Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  4. Greenberg v. Whitcomb Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Laird v. Town of OtsegoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Woodstock Operating Corp. v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1920
  2. Girvin v. Georgia Veneer & Package Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API