Legal Opinion

Greenberg v. Whitcomb Lumber Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1895PublishedCited by 32 opinions

Appeals from orders of the circuit court for Shawano county: Johh G-oodland, Circuit Judge. The duly verified complaint, omitting formal parts, is as follows: “ The above-named plaintiff, by Mylrea, Marchetti & Bird, his attorneys, for a complaint alleges and shows to the court: “ Eirst.

Read the full summary

Appeals from orders of the circuit court for Shawano county: Johh G-oodland, Circuit Judge. The duly verified complaint, omitting formal parts, is as follows: “ The above-named plaintiff, by Mylrea, Marchetti & Bird, his attorneys, for a complaint alleges and shows to the court: “ Eirst. That defendant The Whitcomb Lumber Company at all the times herein mentioned was, and still is, a corporation organized under the laws of Wisconsin, and doing business at Whitcomb, Shawano county, Wisconsin, where, among other things, in its business it operated a certain machine for the purpose of sawing…

1Opinion of the CourtNewmaN, J.

The complaint states, in substance, that the defendant The Whitcomb Lumber Company is a corporation; that the defendant Pandan Semple was one of its officers and its general managing agent; that its business was the manufacturing of timber into firewood; that it operated, in this work, a machine 'which was defective and dangerous; that it knew' the machine to be defective and dangerous; that the defect which rendered it dangerous was that the saw was defectively and insecurely fastened to its shaft; that the plaintiff was employed to work upon or with this machine; that he was inexperienced…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wright v. J. & S. WilcoxNew York Supreme Court · 1838
  2. Osborne v. MorganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
  3. Phelps v. . WaitNew York Court of Appeals · 1864

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Orcutt v. Century Building Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  2. Warax v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky · 1896
  3. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. AbernathySupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  4. Mayberry v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  5. Skala v. LehonIllinois Supreme Court · 1931

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API