Legal Opinion

Noble v. Noble

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1940PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.

On this appeal, we are called upon to determine the validity of certain orders entered by the court below in a proceeding by the plaintiff, a married woman, for separate support for herself and minor children, brought under the provisions of § 33-207, et seq., Oregon Code 1930. The decree was in favor of the plaintiff, and the defendant, her husband, has appealed. The testimony has not been brought up, and the questions made arise upon the record, and the construction proper to be given to the applicable statute. There is an assignment of error attacking the decree in loto, but, as the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Kendall v. United States Ex Rel. StokesSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
  2. Finlay v. FinlayNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  3. Pacific Elevator Co. v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1913
  4. In Re HeathSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  5. Lovejoy v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1920

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. ShumwayOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State v. FolkesOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  3. SEALE v. McKennonOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Rodda v. RoddaOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  5. In Re the Marriage of CrockerOregon Supreme Court · 2001

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API