Legal Opinion

Gauld v. Board of Supervisors of San Francisco

California Supreme Court

Decided September 1, 1898No. S. F. No. 924PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, sustaining a demurrer to an application for a writ of review. J. M. Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

The present litigation was inaugurated upon application for a writ of review to annul the proceedings of the board of supervisors of the city and county of San Francisco, looking toward the future granting of a franchise for the conduct of the telephone business. A demurrer was sustained to the petition of Gauld, and the ease is now before the court upon the sufficiency of the facts set forth in that petition to justify the issuance of the writ. The sufficiency of the petition is attacked from many points, and we need notice hut a single one. At the time this proceeding was inaugurated no…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lamb v. SchottlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  2. People ex rel. San Francisco v. County JudgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Sayers v. Superior Court of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Wilson v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1853

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gumilla v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Holabird v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Illinois Life Insurance v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1927
  4. Schumacher v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  5. State ex rel. McKenzie v. BrownWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API