Legal Opinion

People ex rel. San Francisco v. County Judge

California Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1871No. 2,520PublishedCited by 12 opinions

The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtBhodes, C. J.

delivered the-opinion -of the Court, Temple, J., Wallaoe, J., and Cbockett, J., concurring;

'The Commissioners appointed in pursuance of the Act of April 4, 1864 (Stats. 1863-4, p. 352), in the proceedings *480for tbe extension of Montgomery and Connecticut streets, presented to tbe County Judge their written application, requesting that be should determine tbe compensation to be paid to them, for their services as such Commissioners, and tbe amount to be paid for services of counsel, etc., as provided by tbe Act of March 4, 1870 (Stats. "1869-70, p. 146). Tbe County Judge thereupon designated tbe…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lynde v. NobleNew York Supreme Court · 1822
  2. People ex rel. Livingston v. PachecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  3. People ex rel. Noble v. Board of Commissioners of PilotsNew York Supreme Court · 1862
  4. Wilson v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1853
  5. Devlin v. PlattNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1861

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Schwarz v. County CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
  2. State ex rel. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  3. State v. SchneiderMissouri Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Holabird v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Page v. Commercial National Bank of Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1911

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API