Legal Opinion
In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Davenport
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided June 27, 2002No. OSB 97-138; SC S47245Published
1Opinion of the Court
49 P.3d 91 (2002)
334 Or. 298
In re Complaint as to the CONDUCT OF John P. DAVENPORT, Accused.
(OSB 97-138; SC S47245)
Supreme Court of Oregon.
Argued and Submitted November 7, 2000.
Decided June 27, 2002.
Jeffrey D. Sapiro, Disciplinary Counsel, Lake Oswego, argued the cause and filed the request for review, briefs, and additional authorities for the Oregon State Bar.
Marc D. Blackman, Portland, argued the cause for the accused. With him on the brief and additional authorities was Ransom Blackman LLP, Portland.
Before CARSON, Chief Justice, and GILLETTE, DURHAM, LEESON, and RIGGS, Justices.[*]
2Per curiam
In this…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
3Cases cited36 opinions
- Caha v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of EadieOregon Supreme Court · 2001
- United States v. Michael Curtis KeysCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Burnell G. WatsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1991
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.