Legal Opinion

McKeon v. Wolf

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 29, 1898PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Assumpsit.—Common counts. Trial in the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Edward F. Dunne, Judge, presiding. Finding and judgment for plaintiff. Error by defendant.

1Opinion of the Court

He. Justice Seaes

delivered the opinion of the court.

Plaintiffs in error contend that the agreements upon which the recovery here is founded are within the application of Section 130, Chapter 38 of the Revised Statutes, and hence are void.

Defendant in error contends, first, that the objection to a recovery upon this ground was not contemplated in the submission of issues to the trial court upon the agreed statement of facts, and hence can not be urged here; and, secondly, that the agreements are not in violation of the statute invoked.

We are of opinion that the stipulation of submission is…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1805
  2. Hamilton Co. v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
  3. Pope v. HankeIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Schneider v. TurnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Pearce v. FooteIllinois Supreme Court · 1885

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte RoquemoreCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  2. Ex Parte MuckenfussCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
  3. Town of Stites v. Wiggins Ferry Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1901
  4. Hurt v. Oak Downs, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  5. Rohrer v. TrainaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API