Legal Opinion

Matchulot v. City of Ansonia

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 27, 1932PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.

The finding, by which the adequacy of the charge must be tested, states that the defendant offered evidence that in the afternoon of Friday, December llth, 1931, employees of the American Brass Company, without the direction or knowledge of the defendant city, removed the five-by-five inch timber which formed the top rail of a barrier fence between North Fourth Street and a canal on the Brass Company’s property,1 and moved the bottom rail to and nailed it along the top of the posts, and that such was the condition of the fence at the time—■ Sunday evening December 13th—when an automobile…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bartram v. Town of SharonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
  2. Aaronson v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
  3. Ritter v. City of SheltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  4. Upton v. Town of WindhamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1902
  5. Gustafson v. City of MeridenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Falkowski v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  2. Tirendi v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
  3. Petrelli v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  4. Ward v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
  5. Zeidwig v. City of DerbySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API