Legal Opinion

Zumwalt v. Lindland

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1964PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoodwin, J.

This is an action for damages arising out of a personal injury sustained in an automobile accident. *29The plaintiff was a gnest passenger within the meaning of OES 30.115. He appeals from a judgment entered on a verdict for the defendant.

Two young men had gone to a dance. Both had been drinking beer. There is no allegation or proof that either was intoxicated. The parties left the dance in the defendant’s pickup truck. Shortly thereafter, the vehicle failed to negotiate a curve and left the highway.

Prom the plaintiff’s description of the defendant’s driving, the jury could have found that the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Williamson v. McKennaOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Ritter v. BEALSOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Stewart v. HoukOregon Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Cook v. KINZUA PINE MILLS CO.Oregon Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Falls v. MortensenOregon Supreme Court · 1956

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Blackburn v. DortaSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
  2. Leavitt v. GillaspieAlaska Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Hodge v. BordenIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Fassett v. Santiam Loggers, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
  5. McIntosh v. LawranceOregon Supreme Court · 1970

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API