Legal Opinion
MacFarland-Breakell Building Corp. v. New York State Thruway Authority
New York Court of Claims
Decided February 10, 1984No. Claim No. 68371PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Harold E. Koreman, P. J.
Claimant’s action herein is for damages arising out of the alleged breach of a public improvement contract. The defendant’s motion requests dismissal based on claimant’s failure to timely commence its claim pursuant to the requirements of section 145 of the State Finance Law. A cross motion by claimant seeks permission to file a late claim and, in the alternative, requests that its notice of intention be treated as a claim. Although the ultimate issue which must be decided herein is the applicability of section 145 of the State Finance Law to the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bay Terrace Cooperative Section IV, Inc. v. New York State Employees' Retirement System Policemen's & Firemen's Retirement SystemNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Plumbing, Heating, Piping & Air Conditioning Contractors Ass'n v. New York State Thruway AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
- Easley v. New York State Thruway AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
- Santana v. New York State Thruway AuthorityNew York Court of Claims · 1977
- Cantor v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dreger v. New York State Thruway AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Muller v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Finnerty v. New York State Thruway AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Krales v. City UniversityNew York Court of Claims · 1985
- Martino v. New York State Thruway AuthorityNew York Court of Claims · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.