Legal Opinion

Finnerty v. New York State Thruway Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 27, 1988No. Claim No. 69631PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action against the Thruway Authority in the Court of Claims by serving the claim on the Thruway Authority and filing two copies of it with the clerk of the court. Plaintiff neglected to serve the claim upon the Attorney-General and the clerk did not deliver a copy to the Attorney-General. Subsequently, the Attorney-General moved on behalf of the Thruway Authority to dismiss the claim for failure to serve the Attorney-General. The court denied the motion, holding that service on the Attorney-General was unnecessary to give the Court of Claims *942jurisdiction…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Claim of Welch v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  2. Jackson v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  3. Brinkley v. City UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  4. Andriola v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  5. Jones v. City Univ. of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Finnerty v. New York State Thruway AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Shimmerlik v. City University of New YorkNew York Court of Claims · 1988
  3. Duncan v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API