Legal Opinion
Dreger v. New York State Thruway Authority
New York Court of Appeals
Decided December 16, 1992PublishedCited by 118 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division in each case should be affirmed, with costs.
In each of these actions a claim against the State or the Thruway Authority was dismissed for failure to serve a copy of the claim on the Attorney-General in the manner prescribed by Court of Claims Act § 11. In Dreger, the claimant *723served the Thruway Authority but neglected to serve the Attorney-General. In Charbonneau and Dalton, copies of the claims were mailed to the Attorney-General but were not sent by certified mail as the statute requires. Because of these failures, the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gaines v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- George v. Mt. Sinai HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Markoff v. South Nassau Community HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Parker v. MackNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Finnerty v. New York State Thruway AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by118 opinions
- Lepkowski v. State of NYNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- Kolnacki v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- Yonkers Contracting Co. v. Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Lichtenstein v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Long v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
113 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.