Legal Opinion

Breuer v. Arenz

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1932PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOwen, J.

The original complaint, as amended, set forth three causes of action. The first was to recover on a promissory note in the sum of $2,000. This note was paid subsequent to the commencement of the action, thereby terminating that cause of action. The remaining two causes of action arise out of an alleged loan made by the deceased, Henry Richards, to the defendant on or about the 16th day of March, 1925. One of such causes of action is based on an express contract, it being alleged that the plaintiff loaned to the defendant the sum of $1,500 in cash, which he re*437fused to pay. The other cause of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Delfosse v. New Franken Oil Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  2. State ex rel. Reynolds v. BreidenbachWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Breuer v. ArenzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Combs v. HaddockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. Muhlhauser v. BeckerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API