Legal Opinion
Fourth National Bank of Tulsa v. Appleby
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 23, 1993No. 74350PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WATT, Justice.
Which takes precedence between ANR’s mechanics’ and materialmen’s liens and Bank’s mortgages is the central issue in this appeal. The resolution of this central issue requires that we address several matters of first impression.
Dates are critical to our decision. Consequently, we will set out a chronology of significant events. Unless otherwise indicated, the parties stipulated to the dates set out and to all other facts.
CHRONOLOGY
Event Date(s)
OCC entered four orders force pooling Appleby’s mineral interests. ANR was named operator: 6/25/80
Appleby elected to participate in ANR’s…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Russell v. FlanaganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
- Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation, Inc. v. VickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- State Ex Rel. Commissioners of Land Office v. HallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- Pitts v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Continental & Commercial Trust & Savings Bank v. Continental Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- K & H Well Service, Inc. v. Tcina, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Balfour v. NelsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- U.S. Mortgage v. LaubachSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations, Inc. v. Union Bank of California, N.A. (In Re Cornerstone E & P Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2010
- Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations, Inc. v. Union Bank of California, N.A. (In Re Cornerstone E & P Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2010
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.