Legal Opinion

Tesauro v. BAIRD

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 27, 1975No. Appeal, 843PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cercone, J.,

This is an appeal from an order sustaining the appellees’ preliminary objections to the appellant’s mechanic’s lien claim and ordering the mechanic’s lien claim stricken from the mechanic’s lien docket.

The appellant, as a contractor engaged by the owners, allegedly demolished a building formerly located at 1521-23 Locust Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and closed the premises, filled and graded the area, shored, underpinned, rough coated and stuccoed adjacent walls, and removed a wall and replaced substitute material, all in preparation for the contemplated…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. American Car & Foundry Co. v. Alexandria Water Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  2. Samango v. HobbsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  3. O'Kane v. MurraySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  4. Intercoastal Lumber Distributors, Inc. v. DerianSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  5. Este v. Pennsylvania RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Commerce Bank/Harrisburg, N.A. v. KesslerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Castle Pre-Cast Superior Walls of Delaware, Inc. v. Strauss-HammerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Denlinger, Inc. v. AgrestaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Regency Investments, Inc. v. Inlander Ltd.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Terra Technical Services, LLC v. River Station Land, L.P.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API