Dentinger v. Uleberg
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
Defendant appeals from the order denying his alternative motion for judgment non obstante or a new trial, after verdict in favor of plaintiff for injuries received when run into by defendant’s son driving the family automobile upon one of the main streets of Man-kato, plaintiff at the time riding a bicycle.
Since errors in the charge require a new trial, no good purpose can be served by detailing the facts. It is enough to say that the negligence of defendant’s son, the driver of the automobile, was clearly for the jury, also the contributory negligence of plaintiff, so that defendant was not…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Anderson v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Bamka v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Lathrop v. SchutteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
3Cited by12 opinions
- Stolte v. LarkinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- Hueper v. GoodrichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Trudeau v. Sina Contracting Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Faber v. RoelofsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Kapla v. LehtiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.